Le 01/06/2011 08:31, Andre Engels a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:00 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<[email protected]> wrote:
looking at the available data and in the wiki I'm currently missing
some tags for monasteries.
All I found is this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonastery
which suggests to tag former monasteries as historic=monastery and the
monastery building as monastery=yes. If I see this right there is
currently no tag for a monastery as an institution/place, nor for some
of it's parts (the church will be tagged like any other church I
think, the garden could also be tagged with leisure=garden and maybe a
garden type, but the dorms and other specific places could merit some
dedicated tags).
I would like to distinguish between (and maybe more, let's see what
you can contribute).
monastery
convent
canonry
sanctuary
abbey
friary
(some might be attributes or subtags)
For the comunity that operates the place I will make a list in the
wiki so we can propose a set of typical values in unified form.
We could use the keys "operator" and "operator_congregation" (e.g.
"Canons Regular of the Immaculate Conception") for these.
This would be tagged on a surrounding area (or multipolygon relation
or site relation). Any comments? Wikipages I missed? Tags in use?
My proposal would be, but note that it's only a proposal and hasn't
been implemented yet, to add "landuse=religious" for these.
They are different things to be tagged :
* the building, that can be tagged in building=monastery ou
building=convent [1]. Those values are not very used...
* the community living there and I have started trying the tag community
[2].
* the other building that should be tagged as other (farm, workshops,
hostelery...)
IMHO,
The church must be tagged as amenity=place_of_worship +
religion=christian|buhddist... when open to every one (at least to belivers)
I usualy use also the tag building=church for the architecture.
The other building should not be tagged as amenity=place_of_worship, for
it is not open to every body, but the religion+denomination tags could
be used with the tag community for the community buildings.
The other buildings should be tagged for what they are : hangar,
hostellery, shop...
I'm not too much in favour of a landuse=religious, because the landuse,
in itself is not a holy place or a sacred place, and it can be farm,
garden...
I would prefer a relation=site + site=monastery for gathering all the
stuff and defining the whole monastery. This relation could have a tag
access=private to indicate the closure. Usualy, there is a wall, or a
hedge around the closure.
I don't know enough buhddist or other religious communities to improve
the consistancy of a tag "community". It is why I still not have made a
proposal.
I'm interested in knowing your opinion about this way of tagging.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Building
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/building=monastery
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/building=convent
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/Community
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/?key=community
--
FrViPofm (living in a community)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
