On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > You can reuse the existing entrance tags. According to the Richard Fairhurst > duck test, if it looks like a ship, is floating like a ship, it's a ship... > not a building magically floating on the water ;-)
By the same test, a parked ship looks like a building, acts like a building, has entrances like a building... Tagging is not about whether an object naturally conforms to our understanding of the English word, but whether it has the right salient properties that should be usefully shown on a map. I don't know if we have a strict definition of "building" but I would go with something like "a man-made structure with walls that is by default inaccessible to the average pedestrian". We could equally ask, how would you micromap a shipwreck... I would think something like the following would be logical: building=yes tourism=attraction attraction=ship Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
