That would be the two major drawbacks with the current proposal: A. No possibility to have several plug types at the same node. B. No clear way of sharing a node with amenity=fuel.
A: The the same scheme as for "liquid" fuels could be used (i.e. fuel:e85=yes/no, fuel:diesel=yes/no, et.cet). Something like "charging_station:plug:VDE-AR-E-2623-2-2=yes/no" would be nice, and easy to expand with "charging_station:battery:AAA"... B: Data miners and alikes should be able to gather info regarding charging facilities from a amenity=fuel if it has tags matching "charging_station:*". The other way around would of course also be possible, if an charging_station also offers something like fuel:e85. /Jonas On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:06, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote: > For charging stations it seems exceptionally important to define the plug > style > available. A charging station with the wrong plug is just as useful as a > gas station > offering only nuclear fuel pellets. > > The trick is to standardize on names for each of the various charging > paddle styles, > and also allow for multiple types at one location. > -Bryce Nesbitt > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
