Martin, I agree that landuse is not the correct way to do this. What is the recommended way?
I've seen landuse used to name sub-divisions, housing estates, a retirement village, a religious community (not church owned, but where all the houses were originally sold to members of the same religion). Basically any named area smaller than a suburb. Admin_level doesn't seem to work because they are not actually an administration of any sort, once they're sold to the public. Well, the retirement village is, but that's an exception. Stephen On 29 August 2011 23:06, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > We have been recently discussing on the German ML about > landuse=residential. In Germany many mappers were mapping subdivisions > / neighbourhoods [1] with landuse=residential. This led to very rough > landuse information, because in order to keep the (sometimes quite > big) area as a whole they are forced to ignore landuses that don't > fit. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
