On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/18/2011 1:12 PM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I would use lanes=2 there, since that's how many through lanes there are >>> before the turn lanes begin. >> >> And you think any other number of lanes would be *wrong*? > > No. What I don't agree with is that lanes=2 is "missing data" or an "interim > solution". It is simply another way of tagging.
I couldn't disagree with that sentiment more. Tagging the right number of lanes is clearly better than tagging the number of lanes that there used to be. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
