Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:

> pulled this from talk because it was OT there
> 
> 2011/10/8 Paul Norman <[email protected]>:
> >> See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131585141 with a
> >> creation date of 2011-09-28.
> > Should the entire city be tagged with landuse=residential like it
> currently
> > is?
> 
> 
> IMHO it shouldn't. You might find suburbs or hamlets, maybe even
> villages where this might be true or acceptable, but for a whole city
> I'd consider this definitely too rough (too many other landuses inside
> this area which are not residential).
> 
> cheers,
> Martin
> 

>From my personal experience, very few communities, even if containing only a 
>few residences, lack at least one retail, religious, or other non-residential 
>building, usually with an associated parking lot.

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- [email protected]
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to 
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to