On Monday, 10 October 2011, Peter Wendorff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > I think, the last argument Martin has in his reply is the most important one: > Tagging the width of steps is simple - and useful independant of other proposals for mapping steps, if it's equal in general from top to bottom. > > But one usual case is, that steps are around a building etc., so they get smaller upwards (or wider in other cases). > It is not possible to map that simply as attributes, as long as you don't want to have step-width tagged on nodes (something that is error prone because of the missing connection from node to one particular steps-way). > > regards > Peter
Yes, I hadn't thought about a width tag, good idea. In this case I have some extremely accurate measurements. But I do also have some large semi circular and tapering steps to do (though they ate a lot smaller than the photo I sent, so their geographical significance is much less. David
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
