Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@...> writes: > 2011/11/6 Johan Jönsson <johan.j <at> goteborg.cc>: > > It will be nice with a physical tag for the place to play disc_golf. > > > > As the course it self probably could be found in a larger wood or park > > without any clear boundaries of where the course are it is probably > > best not to try to mark a whole area. > > I would try to estimate the area extension and hope that someone later > might refine it in case of errors. You better have an approximation of > the area instead of a node or a new type or relation that nobody > parses. > I have used leisure=park, sport=disc_golf for an approximate area holding the holes. It is really nothing that separates this area from the surrounding park, except for the danger of flying discs. Is this a method used elsewhere? Taking a part of a bigger area and subtagging it with sport=x.
But as said before, there is no problems with introducing a new leisure-value. Then people can use the tag as they want, for a relation, an area or a node. /Johan Jönson _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
