2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier <[email protected]> > Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > 2011/12/6 Jo<[email protected]>: >> >>> I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this >>>> can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations, >>>> AFAIK) >>>> >>> I get complaints if I start using polygons that way... >>> >> >> what kind of complaints? From the editor? Which tags? >> > I created this fuel station:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1492951 and got a complaint from a fellow mapper. He didn't like this one either: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1491170 But maybe I put the tags in the wrong place. JOSM complains with a: Style for outer way mismatches Probably because it doesn't like buildings to be members of a multipolygon relation. >> cheers, >> Martin >> > We use amenity=school in the same way, including buidings, sport > equipment, playground... > Why not for hotels ? > With a multipolygon or with a site relation? Can you show me a few examples of schools mapped this way? Jo
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
