2012/1/16 <[email protected]>: > There was some mention in this thread of the some lack of utility of > "access=no" as a tag-value pair as someone usually has access to somewhere, > it is just impeded by rules or physical barriers; I do agree with this in > general. If we move to the inclusion of a historical layer, then "access=no" > could, in fact, be a default parameter for historical features as they are > truly not accessible due to a time barrier. --ceyockey
What I am missing in this discussion is that access according to the first sentence in the wiki [1] is used "to describe the _legal_ access", so no, access=no shouldn't be used to mark a "time barrier" (non-existing features). cheers, Martin [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
