On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:56:19 +0100, Werner Hoch wrote: > Hi there,
Hello, > the relation type page: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relation > > lists the relatedStreet relation as an similar type of associatedStreet. > > Are there any objection to convert and cleanup the relatedStreets into > associatedStreet relations? > > Often there could be merge several relatedStreet relations together to > one associatedStreet relations, as relatedStreets sometime only > connected single houses to a street. I'm one of those pushing for type=street, and I'd be glad if we could merge all somethingStreet to it :) (which is less error-prone, less chars to type, easier to remember) (we should also include type=collection + collection=street and type=route + route=street -- rationale for the latter is that named routes should be route=road) > Here is my current statistic of street-like relations: > http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/02_Relationstypen/planet_street.html Oh, nice. There you can already see that "street" is already at second place just behind associatedStreet. In Italy it's already superior to it :) (1010 vs. 625 [0]) [0]: http://taginfo.hanskalabs.net/keys/type#values Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
