Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 14:16 +1100, Steve Bennett a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > > He is asking because a local community is maintaining such marks and > > would like to locate them in OSM in addition to the route itself. > > Our current proposal is to use a node tagged with: > > tourism=information > > information=trail_blaze > > hiking=yes > > operator= > > support=tree|pole|rock > > description= > > Maybe the word "marker" rather than trail_blaze. Then it could be used > equally be more formal, permanent trail markers. > > tourism=information > information=trail_marker > > OTOH, information=trail_blaze already has 925 uses, so perhaps that's > the de facto standard already.
"Blaze" also seems more consistent with: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/trailblazed But I agree with you, "marker" sounds better and could cover more cases. Maybe, we could use "marker" as a role in the route relation describing the hiking trail. Each trail_blaze node would be member of the relation with the role "marker". Is this fine? > Btw, I think using "support" this way is a French-ism. I don't > immediately have a better suggestion, maybe > "information:attached_to=tree". I initially suggested to use this key on the french mailing list. I took my inspiration from: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/support#values It is very possible that this key made sense to me because of the similarity with the french word :) Cheers -- Gilles Bassière - Web/GIS software engineer http://gbassiere.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
