Am 25. April 2012 12:25 schrieb Georg Feddern <[email protected]>: > as far as I know and always have considered, that is the meaning in _all_ > cases - because area was invented to differentiate between the linear and > area meaning of a tag, if it is ambiguous. > And it is documented - at least actually - for the use in both directions, > so even to distinguish a linear feature from a default area feature > (area=no).
+1 > If you consider block as an address feature, addr:block should be used at > the address itself, not at the block area in total. > If you consider to describe just the block area - just the perimeter - to > name it, I think place=locality on a closed polygon would be sufficient. > Only if you need to describe the block as an entity - as an 'administrative > object' or something like that - you need a special place= block value. -1, place=locality shouldn't be used here, because according to the wiki it is not to be used for settlements or parts of them. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
