Am 17. Januar 2012 17:29 schrieb sylvain letuffe <[email protected]>: >> Last but not least I'd like to ask you for comments on 3 new values: >> N1. a bridge made of few ropes where you walk on a rope: >> http://bauwiki.tugraz.at/pub/Baulexikon/HaengeSeilBrueckeB/Kaiserschild_1.jpg >> http://www.gruppenstunden-freizeit-programme.de/ferienlager-freizeiten-erlebnisse/freizeit-bilder/seilbruecke/Piratenlager-05-262.JPG >> http://www.bergsteigen.at/pic/d6025434-21f9-4d93-9ce9-42aba5cf00db.jpg >> >> additionally we could tag the amount of ropes (or even more precisely >> the amount of "upper" and "lower" ropes) > Juste an comment to let you know that your "border line ;-)" bridges are > somehow described in this proposal : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata
thank you for noting this. The proposal currently suggests: bridge=yes for "An unspecified bridge type along the via ferrata route" and cable_number=>1 for "For cable bridges the total number of cables, in addition to bridge=yes" I'd suggest to specify the bridge value more detailed than "yes". bridge=cable or cable_bridge doesn't seem reasonable though, as it seems to be a different bridge type: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable-stayed_bridge zip_line as you point out isn't the correct term either. Any suggestions what we could use? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
