Hi, Thanks for providing your insights, Jørgen.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jørgen Elgaard Larsen <j...@elgaard.net> wrote: > Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> See my current try at this here: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/33973144 > > > First of all, you should not use motor_vehicle=private. That does *not* mean > private vehicles, but rather that motor vehicles are allowed "Only with > permission of the owner on an individual basis" Agreed, that's not the right choice then. > Instead, I would suggest: > > motor_vehicle=no > motorcar=yes > goods=no > tourist_bus=no > psv=no What would you do for the access= then? Nothing? And where does the bicycle go? And why do you choose these types and not others whose access is restricted? > As for the date_off and date_on, you should use YYYY-MM-DD format. > Otherwise, it will be impossible for a route planner to parse it. (Besides, > not all non-USAnians know when Memorial Day is). It's not on the same date every year, so that would make that impossible. I guess anyone who would want to access this road would know, or be prepared to find out, when Memorial Day is. I believe it's the last Monday in May, btw. > But note that date_on/date_off has the year in it, so it is not even meant > to be used for periodic access. More like when a new road opens, or an old > one is closed permanently. > day_on/day_off seems only to allow week days, not odd/even/federal_holiday· So this particular case could, as I understand it, not be covered by the current temporal access restrictions scheme? > There is an old proposed feature to use opening_hours syntax: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_tags > but it seems to have been abandoned. > > Anyway, according to that scheme, it would be tagged as: > motorcar:(PH 00:00-24:00;Jun 02-30/2 00:00-24:00;Jul 02-30/2 00:00-24:00; > Aug 02-30/2 00:00-24:00; Sep 02-24/2 00:00-24:00)=yes > bicycle:(Oct-May 00:00-24:00;Jun 01-30/2 00:00-24:00; Jul 01-31/2 > 00:00-24:00;Aug 01-30/2 00:00-24:00;Sep 01-30/2 00:00-24:00)=yes > > I certainly hope that proposal is not approved in its current form! It looks horrible, and would require a JOSM plugin to be manageable for the average mapper. How about access:website=http://www.slcclassic.com/utilities/ud_citycreek_reservations.htm#anchor4 This would be unsuitable for routing but would at least give some info for those who are really looking for it. > > As for the note_2: You should really combine the notes in one "note" tag. Ah yes, someone put that in there before me. Thanks, -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
