Thomas Davie <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, the conclusion, while it involved that, also involved that > there are potential other uses (e.g. on river=intermittent; > stream=intermittent etc) that need to be checked too, and that this > seems like an arbitrary renaming of tags that doesn't gain anything, > but may destroy data. > > Thanks > > Tom Davie > > On 29 May 2012, at 20:08, Worst Fixer wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I used "reply to" instead of "reply to all" in my mail agent. We had > a > > small thread with Thomas. Here is major result we achived. > > > > Thomas expressed opinion that not 100% of water=intermittent have > > other tags, so we have no way count them as water. > > > > In my sub-extract of water=intermittent: > > > > 127310 become intermittent=yes; > > 124417 have already "natural" tag; > > 749 get natural=wetland because "NHD:FType=Inundation Area"; > > 2123 have "waterway" tag; > > 21 has "landuse tag". > > > > 127310-124417-749-2123-21=0. Check sum passed. > > > > This tag came from imports only, that is why it kann be cleaned up > perfectly. > >
For that matter, there are other, non-water-related items that might reasonably be tagged with intermittent=yes, such as a grassy field that is used as a parking lot only if the regular parking lot is full. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
