2012/5/31 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > 2012/5/31 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: >>> 2. A cycle track in UK that is marked as cycle only does not legally prevent >>> pedestrian use but official guidance states: >>> "the route is not intended for pedestrians, there should be a >>> convenient footway or footpath nearby." >> >> This is another story. This "restriction" should be tagged directly on >> the cycle track. > > > isn't this something already expressed with bicycle=designated (and > the way is in the UK. Maybe add a foot=yes if use is not legally > prevented.) ?
Interesting point. My feeling tells me that the word "designated" might(!) express this. But reading the wiki about designated yields: "A preferred or designated route for a specific vehicle type or types. Not compulsory but often marked by a traffic sign". This on the other hand doesn't sound like the use by other vehicles types is discouraged. So we are down to one question: does "designated" mean that other vehicle types are discouraged? Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
