Hi,
Some month ago I tried to start a proposal for rail-trails:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/rail_trail
I startet it with 'rail_trail=yes', but on talk-page some are against
this, because highway=cycleway/footway + railway=abandoned are enough.
Now it propose only the possible rendering.
P.S.: I think I can't send it to: [Talk-us]
Am 28.06.2012, 15:51 Uhr, schrieb Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com>:
* Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> [2012-06-27 12:59 -0400]:
But another popular kind of rail trail, a "rail with trail", cannot
be found in this manner.
[snip]
Does anyone have any ideas for tagging? The simplest would be
something like rail_with_trail=yes or maybe railway=adjacent.
Either of those would work. Between those two, I'm inclined toward
railway=adjacent so the search would be something like
"highway=(path|footway|cycleway) and railway=(abandoned|adjacent)".
Another possibility would be to use rail_trail=yes, which would apply to
any rail trail. It would be implied by a non-motor-vehicle highway= tag
and railway=abandoned, but could always be specified to be unambiguous.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
