It feels more like a collection rather than a geospatial relation to me, and (pace the conversation about refs on highways), it seems simpler to put the info directly on the relevant ways, rather than making the ways a member of a relation where the info is stored.
In general, I think slow-changing infrastructure-type information is better recorded on the ways. Whereas service-type information is better recorded in relations. Richard On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Richard Mann < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Maybe I'd better just copy all the info in tracks=* into a new tag, and >> let Dave set them all to tracks=1. >> >> >> > Instead of creating a new tag duplicating the information, you could also > create a relation containing all tracks as members. > > Pieren > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
