Hi David, Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 08:26:07 schrieb David ``Smith'': > Wouldn't that be... > access > access:conditional > vehicle > vehicle:conditional > motor_vehicle > motor_vehicle:conditional > hgv > hgv:conditional > ...?
Actually, no. To quote: "For access restrictions it is *allowed* to use the abbreviated form by omitting access: in front of the category." The list would therefore look like: access access:conditional access:vehicle access:vehicle:conditional vehicle vehicle:conditional access:motor_vehicle access:motor_vehicle:conditional motor_vehicle motor_vehicle:conditional access:hgv access:hgv:conditional hgv hgv:conditional However, since *both* the Conditional Restrictions and the Extended Conditions proposal have this kind of shortening for backward compatibility, I deliberately omitted these tags. Eckhart _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
