2012/10/1 Ronnie Soak <[email protected]>: > 2012/10/1 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > I can't follow you here: You say that natural=water is flawed, that > there might be fountains without water and that a fountain might > consist of several materials besides water. > And still you recommend to tag the whole area as natural=water, > amenity=fountain?
nah, of course not, your question was for a generic tag for enclosures of water: >> Do you know any other tag fitting small scale, urban, man made >> enclosures of water (possibly fed by a fountain or well)? and here I replied you could tag this natural=water (but refering to only parts with actual water), and you might subtag this more specifically to express which kind of water (proposal water=) The fountain is another issue and should be tagged with amenity=fountain. I think it is acceptable to have a very generic interpretation of natural=water as a hint for the renderer, but if you can you should add additional tags to better specify the feature. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
