2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: > You're right. I'll change the proposal in the following way: > a) building=stable, no building:use: looks like a stable, used as a stable > b) building=stable, building:use=<not stable>: looks like a stable, > but used for something different > c) building=<whatever>, building:use=stable: looks like <whatever>, > but is used as stable > > I assume, that the majority of who used building=stable in the past > meant "it is used as a stable". > > Better?
yes, this would be consistent (e.g. with how we handle churches). What could be discussed is the choice of the key: whether a stable (function) should be tagged with a building subtag like "building:use" instead of using a "main" feature namespace like amenity or man_made (i.e. man_made=stable) in a) and c). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
