2012/12/4 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: > Before we use some strong words lets take a look at the issue: > according to taginfo maxspeed:wet is used 602 times. You may subtract > one or two hundred as I added them. So we are talking about a tag > that's currently used less than 500 times and without a known (at > least I dont know one) application. As such a speed limit is quite > common people either didn't care enough to tag it or maxspeed:wet was > just a try.
I am not sure if this is really a common maxspeed condition, but I think that 602 of this particular feature is not very few. But neither too much to ever change it ;-) Also please don't forget that maxspeed:wet is up to this > second completely undocumented. it is documented, you get lots of hits in the wiki when searching for it, e.g. here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_tags http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_access_tags http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Modifiers_for_access_tags > You (Pieren) are right if you say, that all things should be put on > the table before voting. I don't think that a vote in a certain direction does imply that you can never have a different opinion on the same topic in the future. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
