I had looked into this possibility, but it would be a novelty: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=water_bus shows not a single use. And: The routes of the biggest "Waterbus" network of the Netherlands in Dordrecht is tagged as follows:
Example: way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159752173 bicycle <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle?uselang=en-GB> = yes foot <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot?uselang=en-GB> = yes hgv = no motorcar<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcar?uselang=en-GB>= no motorcycle <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcycle?uselang=en-GB>= no name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en-GB> = Waterbus Drechtsteden operator<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator?uselang=en-GB>= Waterbus B.V. route <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route?uselang=en-GB> = ferry<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=ferry?uselang=en-GB> :-) Volker On 6 December 2012 23:21, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>wrote: > > I would use for 'vaporetto' access=no foot=yes, for 'motonave' access=no > > foot=yes bicycle=yes. 'ferryboats' typical have some maxwight, maxheight > or > > something like this. > > > > The problem with vehicle=no is, that there are several other "things", > which > > are no vehicles then passengers. Eg. a horse. > > > maybe they would be better mapped as kind of buses than as ferries? At > least the feeling when using them is very much that of a bus. If you > don't like to map them as "bus", what about "water_bus"? > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
