On 7 December 2012 10:27, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Markus Lindholm > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Created first example of provides_feature >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2623059 > > Your relation type name "provides_feature" is too vague and could be > used for all relations...
Do you have a alternative suggestion? It's on purpose that I left the name of the relation a bit vague, so that one could expand it later with other roles besides the two (address and entrance) that I came now up with. > Anyway, most of the mappers will prefer to create 1 node with > duplicated address instead of creating 3 nodes and your relation. > Please, think about contributors first. All ideas making data > consumers life easier but mappers life much more complicated are > failing. Sure, this is not basic level mapping but it builds on existing objects. And as people do more and more micro-mapping this would be a suggestion for how to do it. /Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
