I should have also pointed at the revision to the original suggestion which I wrote after comments were provided at talk-us --> see http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010187.html . This doesn't use amenity. --ceyockey
-----Original Message----- >From: Chris66 <[email protected]> >Sent: Jan 12, 2013 11:34 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Tagging] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM (this time in >plain text) > >Am 12.01.2013 17:21, ceyockey wrote: > >> There is a thread of discussion on the Talk-us board about how and whether >> to represent Adopt-a-highway features. >> See >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html >> as the top of the thread. It was suggested that this come over to the >> tagging board >> for further discussion. >> > >Hi, >I'm not lucky with the amenity-Tag. Don't think this feature is a amenity. > >Chris > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
