On 15/01/13 12:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/1/15 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]>: >> 2013/1/15 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: >>> IMHO animal is a good key for this, but you could also use one of the >>> others like amenity, man_made, building, leisure ;-) >> >> Actually I think that animal is a rather bad key for this. To me this >> would name the animal the feature is related to. Taginfo also tells us >> that the main use of this key is the value "yes". The other values are >> a mixture of features and animals. So not really a clear idea behind >> this key. > > > Yes, you are right that actual usage of the key doesn't back up this > suggestion. I was referring to this page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal which lists values like > "swimming", "wellness", "cemetery", "crematorium" etc. for the animal > key. Maybe we should decide which way to go here (e.g. IF we wanted to > discourage tagging animal types with this we could propose > animal:species or for_animal:species or simply species for this use > case).
The second part (species) comes from attraction=animal. This needs to be clarified. I tend to use genus=*, species=* or even taxon=* for a description of the animals in jail. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
