2013/2/1 Tobias Knerr <[email protected]>: > On 01.02.2013 07:22, Martin Vonwald (imagic) wrote: >> We have a spatial database so if all features are within a closed way there >> is no need for a relation. Why is there a different reasoning for a bridge? > > Because it is usually _not_ the case that all the features within the > bridge outline polygon belong to the bridge.
For example? And I'm talking about features on the same level/layer. If you argue with different layers than we would have a problem with the famous waterpark if a bridge runs over it. But I doubt that many would suggest a site-relation in such situation. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
