On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > wrote:
> The natural=wood / landuse=forest distinction is flawed and creates > useless (IMHO) debates how to distinguish them, and which level of > human intervention still justifies the predicate (in this reading of > the key) "natural". In practise some mappers prefer natural=wood where > other mappers would set landuse=forest (for the exact same situation). > I see this as being the same distinction of landuse=farm versus natural=grassland. In both cases, there's human intervention on the landuse part, whereas natural=* would be unmanaged.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
