>buffers), I think a landuse= value is appropriate. It isn't >residential, industrial, or retail. Probably the same landuse tag is >appropriate for a big resort as for a regular hotel.
In the beginning it took a while to realize, that the osm tagging system as-it-was-at-the-start omits some tags when some other tag "logically normally" implies something not mentioned anywhere: leisure=park could imply landuse=leisure leisure=resort could imply landuse=leisure leisure=pitch should (often) be inside an implied landuse=leisure and so on. Why is it so, then, I hear you ask; the answer is that for "simple" mapmaking the depicted leisure element is more important/will be rendered instead of some generic landuse=leisure tag, which tells us very little about the physical contents. Likewise most don't tag the area with amenity=university with any landuse tag - some do use landuse=civil. -- Alv _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
