On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2013/2/22 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> >> >> I'm not entirely sure I understood your question, but you shouldn't map >> non-ways. Routers could be developed that route through non-ways, if there >> is no cliff or something else in the way. A router could route along the >> contour lines, to make the hike through forest easier. But if there is no >> path, don't map it. > > > > I'm also not sure if I got you right, but in the example (hiking route, > presumably sign posted, crossing a parking with no explicit footway) I'd > connect the footway to the road network and won't interrupt the route. >
I feel dirty every time I do that, they are usually tagged as surface=mud.. :-) Basically I map them if there really is a path there and it seems usefull, even though it's clearly not a designated path. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
