2013/2/23 Peter Wendorff <[email protected]> > Am 23.02.2013 20:02, schrieb Jo: > > It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2 >> members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your >> imaginary gap). >> >> If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And you >> don't need to add nodes to a relation which consists of ways. >> > -1 > 1) If you do it like that and any validation finds gaps on both ends of a > member way with this role, it's impossible to say which one is intentional > and which is not (or if both are intentional). > 2) using the role for this creates conflicts if e.g. the way in fact has > already a role like forward or backward for example.
True > > This doesn't just have implications for the validator, but it also might >> involve changing the code which sorts the member ways. >> > right. but currently nodes aren't sorted anyway at least in JOSM, so > that's a basic problem that should be solved, I think. > I work with routes a lot and to keep my sanity, I always sort them to find out whether they are continuous. That's why I didn't think of it that they don't necessarily have to be sorted to be valid routes. Polyglot
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
