Good question. It may be up to each mapper to make the distinction. Myself I would definitely use operators distinguishing : If a whole big plant is divided between two or more operators, I would map a separate area for each operator.
Foremost, areas must reflect land occupation. If 2 different operators' plants are contiguous in reality then areas must be contiguous too. Do you have any example which can illustrate such situation in the wiki? Cheers. 2013/3/14 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > Could you explain when we should map several adjacent plants, and when > they would be considered one big power plant consisting of several > parts? How can the distinction be made? Does the area have to be > contiguous? > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
