On 08/04/2013 09:07, Alberto wrote:
Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link
to their Wiki pages.
For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power
refinements, as you suggest.

We really need a consistent life cycle scheme that defines all stages of an objects life, that is proposed, construction, (active), disused, abandoned and historic (completely gone). The <life cycle state>:<key>=* scheme is my favourite. Somebody just needs to make a proposal (it would basically be a generalisation of the disused:*=* tag).

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts for a comparison of current ways of tagging life cycles.

Ole / polderrunner

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to