On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Phil! Gold <[email protected]> wrote: > a) If the trail meanders a little from side to side (where the old > railway would have just gone straight), I match the way to the trail > and trust that the semantics of "this used to be a railway" remain > intact.
Interesting. I can't think of any around here that do that - must be a cultural thing. > > b) If the trail diverges significantly from the old railway (to take a > detour or something similar), I make a separate ways for the trail and > old railway. An example is http://osm.org/go/ZZfEh16SR-- , where the > trail was diverted to better cross the road or > http://osm.org/go/ZZfEbCqE , where a mall was built in the path of the > old railway. Cool, same here. Often happens where the rail bridge hasn't been restored. > c) If there are still rails present, even if they definitely qualify as > railway=abandoned, I use two ways, like http://osm.org/go/ZcJqM34YW- > (not my work, but a decent example). Ah, I haven't seen many like that either. I like the end result. Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
