I was going to enter a long rambling rant about this subject against the anti-"mechanical edits" gang (part of the anti-import and anti-aerial imagery groups)....it seems like some of them just like bad data and no standards.
But a simple +1 to Tobias' comments. Crazy guidelines in the Mechanical Edit Policy wiki. If everyone followed them no-one would ever edit a typo at all (maybe that is the plan...) I would also say the biggest issue I see here for the subject of Recreation_ground (landuse vs leisure) is that the editors have different standards. Surely we should be addressing that and getting the editors to have consistent standards for this. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Recreation-ground-landuse-vs-leisure-tp5762723p5762891.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
