I thought the best practice was to define a building as a way, then put a bank node within the building, and possibly at ATM node as well. I guess it could be defined as a relation.
It doesn't appear that there are many ways with amenity=bank, they're almost always nodes, even though they're almost always in buildings big enough to justify a way. I guess it's mostly a matter of how much data there is on the building footprint. But if two nodes are also acceptable (ignoring the building way), then maybe that's the easiest way to go in this case, since ATM's so easily stand alone, don't have "hours", etc. Thanks, Tac On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Peter Wendorff <[email protected]> wrote: > probably inside the polygon of the bank above: _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
