On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote:
> What about > addr:housenumber=801 > addr:street=North Mingo Road > addr:lot=252 > Under current rendering, won't that create lots of little 801's all scattered on the map? Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot numbers (e.g. find me lot 252 of Camp Mingo at 801 Mingo Road)? ------------------------------------------ name=Camp Mingo tourism=camp_site addr:housenumber=*801* addr:street=North Mingo Road addr:city=Mingoville addr:postcode=XXXXX website=* addr:street=Camp Mingo addr:housenumber=*252* group_only=yes power_supply=cee_17_blue ------------------------------------------ Camps are a bit like apartment buildings which have a single postal address on tax records, but multiple units. Perhaps some inspiration from apartment mapping would help? addr:flat and addr:door exist but are not widely used.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
