Ok, good. See if this matches up: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Holger Dieterich <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Bryce, > > I'm the co-founder of Wheelmap and also the initiator of this proposal. > > I totally agree with you: > - the tagging of stand-alone toilets should remail > wheelchair=yes/no/limited. > - other POIs need more detailed information about the toilet, that's why I > propose toilets:wheelchair=yes/no (It is the no1 request by users of > wheelmap, see here: http://wheelmap.uservoice.com/forums/31554-general ) > > Regards, > Holger > > > > > > 2013/6/26 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Brian Wolford < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I too prefer toilets:wheelchair=* >>> >> >> Have a look at >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets >> also >> >> I'd say a standalone toilet should stick to wheelchair=yes to keep with >> the well established wheelmap. >> But a place might have: >> >> shop=bakery >> toilets=yes >> toilets:wheelchair=limited >> toilets:supervised=yes >> >> But for any proposal involving accessibility, could you get someone from >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wheelmap >> to comment? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
