On 26/giu/2013, at 13:59, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> A new tag called residential, where the value specifies the type of
>>> residential, such as:
>>>
>>> residential=apartment
>>> residential=condo
>>> residential=co-op
>>> residential=single_room_occupancy
>
>> Not sure if I can agree, what does this tag "residential" express?
>
> It expresses the presence of a residence, like shop=* expresses the
> presence of a shop.
ok, so it is about usage, not about architectural typology, right? You could
add this tag also for a dwelling under a bridge or for a dwelling in a church?
>
>> Is this a building type?
>
> No. It is an expression of a type of residence. It could optionally be
> used in conjunction with a building, optionally, such as a building
> tagged:
>
> building=yes
> residence=co-op
please use a more detailed building type then yes if you can
>> A building usage tag?
>
> No, it's the same as shop=*
so it is a usage tag, probably on sub building level
I'd prefer to stick to established tags like building:use complemented by the
floors it applies to, AFAIR like proposed in the 3D section of the wiki
>
>> How does it relate to landuse, how to
>> building=building-type and established values?
>
> The problem we're having is that our landuse is dense urban landuse,
> which has multi-use buildings, with towers that include several
> different types of features such as retail, office buildings, and
> residential, all in one building.
yes, this is understood
IMHO also with this new tag we'd still need (or better have) a (or more)
suggested landuse values for different kind of mixes
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
