Am 26.06.2013 02:29, schrieb Murry McEntire: > As part of the shop=bakery,bread_bakery,confectionery proposal voting, > several have commented that the diet:<diet_type>=* tag should be used > instead of <diet_type>=* tag (e.g., diet:gluten_free=* instead of > gluten_free=*. Since the diet:<diet_type> did previously pass a formal > vote, I'm inclined to listen but the case would be more convincing if > the amenity=restaurant didn't list gluten_free=*, lactose_free=*, > organic=* (as well as the diet=* tag) and if the diet=* web page listed > diet:lactose_free and diet:organic as options. The restaurant page may > explain why gluten_free=* is used more than diet:gluten_free=* in OSM > (52 vs. 35). > > Is organic part of the diet: tag or does it stand alone? > > If tags are added to diet=*, I believe lactose_free is in common use > whereas lacto_free is not so much. Also consider that a product made > with lactose removed dairy would accurately be lactose_free but not > lacto_free. Lactose content, not dairy origin, is the important tag for > those with lactose intolerance. Is Lactofree being a brand name any > reason to avoid likenesses (lacto_free) in OSM tags? > > I've got my hands full with my proposal (and Colorado fire area > mapping), so someone else should straighten out use of the diet: tag on > the wiki.
* I did add diet:gluten_free= to all objects with gluten_free=. * I did add diet:lacto_free=* and diet:lactose_free=* * I did add links to diet from both pages and moved both under the proposal namespace and marked both for deletion * Maybe we could delete lactose_free=* right away as its usage is zero. Anything else todo ? Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
