There are species that are both broad-leaved and evergreen. One example would
be magnolia trees. They drop old leaves in the spring, as new leaves grow. At
no time is the tree leafless.
John Sturdy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
> > > Hey
> > >
> > > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling
> for
> > > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a
> nice
> > > task for a bot.
> >
> > Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved".
> >
> > > On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not
> > > tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it
> is
> > > not that good to use different meanings of one key.
> >
>
> On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than
> broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are
> deciduous
> but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal "technical" term
> (the
> others being "evergreen").
>
> __John
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
John F. Eldredge -- [email protected]
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
