Am 11.07.2013, 04:42 Uhr, schrieb Friedrich Volkmann <[email protected]>:
On 10.07.2013 18:39, Masi Master wrote:
some mappers think, they have to set these access tags. Potlatch and iD
have
a select menue, which shout "hey, please select foot & bicycle are
allowed".
But I think this is not good!
That's also my impression. Potlatch users often set lots of unnecessary
tags just because they are selectable. It's like a form which you try to
fill out completely.
It is better to tag signs: bicycle=yes only if
there is a "bicycle free" sign. Same with other signs. So if we see the
tags, we know which sign is there, and backwards.
Yes, we should tag what we see, not the restrictions implied by laws.
Those should be defined via Wiki pages like:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
I don't see a benefit of mapping the traffic signs themselves, though.
It only matters which restrictions apply to which ways, not how the
signs look like or where they are located.
Sorry, I wrote a bit fuzzy. I don't mean mapping traffic signs themselves.
Only tagging the meaning of them at the way.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
