Am 11.07.2013, 23:26 Uhr, schrieb fly <[email protected]>:
Am 11.07.2013 23:02, schrieb fly:
Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master:
Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly <[email protected]>:
Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What
tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails?
I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with
bicycle/foot/horse=(official/)designated/yes/no.
I think, it is nice to see for who the trail is made for! So I would
prefer bridleway & cycleway etc. (A minor problem is the
high-ranking/strict default-value (i mean "designated"), better it is
only *=yes)
You can not often tell for who the ways are mode for. Many are multiuse
, some change over the seasons and it always needs on personal
conditions and abilities.
Thats right, outside of towns an villages there are normaly unpaved
trails. And nearly all of them are normal multiuse trails.
But paved trials or paths can be assigned to footway or cycleway. Or a
trail with very soft (sand or mud) surface to bridleway. It also depends a
bit on access-signs.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
