On 19.07.2013 19:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
they are both. If you investigated the situation and you are sure that you can provide a good estimate for a polygon describing an address I'd say that's preferable and you don't have to add address duplicates to all features inside this polygon, but mappers should also enter addresses on nodes when they are not able or willing to investigate further to get this polygon. In this case also 2 and more POIs sharing the same address should each get their own set.
I agree with that, except for the first sentence. Mapping an address as a standalone node is better than not mapping it at all, but that does not make it a "feature". It's just like creating a node with name=* and nothing else.
-- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
