On 01.08.2013 18:32, William Rieck wrote: Hey doug
> A route relation would work, in which you could specify the direction. A relation is usually used for each signed route but not just for the piste. > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, doug brown <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I do not understand the notation that has been used in these > replies. for example, piste:type=nordic contains three elements, > and tags have only two elements: key and value. I would appreciate > some carification on this notation. > > Also, to further clarify my question, I am tagging the park trails, > all of which are multiple use, as follows (key, value): > (highway, path) > (horse, yes) > (bicycle, no) > (snowmobile, designated) > (ski, crosscountry) > (sac_scale, hiking) > (surface, dirt) > (trail_visibility, excellent) > (width, 1.5) Nice, I am not sure: 1. if horse=yes is needed but it is not wrong 2. snowmobile=designated seems to be a heavy right of access, are you sure that it should not simply be "yes" ? 3. surface values are really tricky, I never really understood the differences between dirt,ground and earth but that is worth a different thread. > This tagging scheme was developed from the responses I received from > previous questions to this forum. Now I need to factor one trail > that is oneway only for cross country skiing. I don't understand > how the piste fits is. Pistes have their own key prefix "piste:". Have a look at the proposal [1] where also some more tags for piste features/attributes are listed. There you will find piste:oneway=yes/no which is useful for the way and any route relation with route=ski/piste. Cheers fly ---- [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste_Maps#Type _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
