Voting for: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets Is at eleven yes, and one "no".
The no is conditional on switching to a scheme allowing counting (e.g. 4 seats, 3 urinals). However, I am not interested in mapping to that level of detail, and would like to leave that to a future effort. While capacity tagging does no particular harm, counting the facilities for both genders will prove problematic for many. Capacity tagging does not add personal value for me (either large or small facilities may have a long line at the time I visit, for example). Any advice how to proceed? The "no" votor is not currently responsive, perhaps vacationing.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
