Hiking trail relations and other route relations have already been mapped with the role "start" on elements at the start of the route (often a guidepost). I suggest you stick to that and try fomalizing it. "end" seems a good role for the end.
lørdag 10. august 2013 skrev Fernando Trebien følgende: > That would be mapped later, but yes, I support extending the > definition of route relations with members of such role (which would > then reference the POIs we are importing now). The role could be named > "start", "entrance" or "head". Perhaps "entrace" would cause confusion > with other uses of the word "entrace" in OSM (generally referring to > building entrances). Maybe "entrypoint" is a little better as a > hiking/cycling trail could have multiple access points from a major > system (like highways). > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:25 PM, [email protected] <javascript:;> < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > And a hiking route relation with role start or entrance ? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > > -- > Fernando Trebien > +55 (51) 9962-5409 > > "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) > "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
