Thomas, you say the tag should apply to facilities "housing law enforcement and/or visitor assistant services" but then say it shouldn't be used on facilities that "do not include a law enforcement function". This seems contradictory, unless you didn't really mean that "or".
Also, does this law enforcement function really apply to all park rangers, or just those in certain jurisdictions or levels of government? I could easily see this tag used in national, state, and county parks. Brad On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Colson <[email protected]> wrote: > I’d update the definition to state facilities housing law enforcement > and/or visitor assistant services such as those commonly found in National > Parks, Forests, Wildlife Refuges, and State Parks. Tag should not be used > on facilities that do not include a law enforcement function such as > information kiosks or campground registration offices. In most cases, a > single structure will house many of these services.**** > > ** ** > > Current text only references national parks. **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Clifford Snow [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:42 PM > *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us-nps] [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - > ranger_station**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > After reading the discussion and incorporating what I could, I am moving** > ** > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_station > **** > > to the next step. Please comment per voting procedures, here or on the > talk page.**** > > > I like your proposal. It would simplify mapping in parks with dedicated > ranger stations. Since there are 59 National Parks on our radar, each with > a least one ranger station, often more, the feature will be used throughout > the US. **** > > ** ** > > A Wikipedia search list over 6,000 results for ranger stations. The first > few pages appear to be sites that should be mapped.**** > > ** ** > > -- **** > > Clifford**** > > ** ** > > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch**** > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
