All we are discussing about here is hypothetical. I didn't update the power transmission proposal yet and I'm not sure I'll do.
Let's say it's just a big wish. I think it's dangerous to let the well established stuff prevailing. We had this problem on power=line, now on power=pole/tower (not to mention other domain features). What's next gentlemen ? If a mistake (deliberately or just because the model isn't developped enough) is done, it seems nothing can correct it afterwards. Don't pretend selecting power=transformer" OR ("transformer=yes" AND "power=*") is more efficient (or even a good thing) than only selecting power=transformer . And it will be done just because things are deeply rooted in wiki and tag-info. That's just astounding. *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2013/8/14 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > > > Il giorno 14/ago/2013, alle ore 01:40, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> ha > scritto: > > > Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net> writes: > > > >> I would prefer that you didn't pretend we will deprecate a tag so > >> widely used just so a small proportion of them can have another power > >> tag on it when we can easily just add transformer=yes or something > >> similar. > > > > I also think we shouldn't deprecate a tag in very widespread use. > > > +1, I also agree we shouldn't deprecate power=tower, please read my "if > we'd" as "if we ever would" ;-). It was merely hypothetical. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging